Abstract:
Climate change has become a major concern globally, particularly to rural communities who have to find rapid coping solutions. Several vulnerability assessment approaches have been developed in the last decades. This comes along with higher risk of using different methods resulting in sometimes different conclusions thereby making comparisons difficult and decision making non-consistent across areas. We assessed effect of methods and computational approaches on estimates of people’s vulnerability using data collected from the Gambia. Twenty four indicators reflecting vulnerability components (exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity) were selected for this purpose. Data were collected through household surveys and key informant interviews. One hundred and fifteen respondents were surveyed across six communities and two administrative districts. Results were compared over three computational approaches: the maximum value transformation normalization, the z-score transformation normalization, and simple averaging. Regardless of approaches used, communities that have a high exposure to climate change and extreme events were the most vulnerable. Furthermore, vulnerability was strongly related to the socio-economic characteristics of farmers. The survey evidenced variability in vulnerability among communities and administrative districts. Comparing output across approaches, overall, people in the study area were found to be highly vulnerable using the simple average and maximum value transformation, whereas they were only moderately vulnerable using the z-score transformation approach. We suggest that assessment approach-induced discrepancies be accounted for in international debates to harmonize/standardize assessment approaches in order to makeg outputs comparable across regions. This would increase relevance of decision making for adaptation policies.
Key words: Gambia, maximum value transformation, simple averaging, vulnerability assessment, West Africa, z-score transformation
Language:
English
Date of publication:
2021
Country:
Region Focus:
West Africa
University/affiliation:
Conference:
Volume:
19
Number:
1
Pagination:
920-928.
Collection:
RUFORUM Working document series
Licence conditions:
Open Access
Access restriction:
Form:
Web resource
Publisher:
ISSN:
1607-9345
E_ISSN:
Edition: