Abstract:
Water flow and storage within the root zone constrains water availability and use in rain-fed crop
production, especially in the dryland cropping systems, where farmers are resource-strained and
are not motivated to practice soil and water management. A study was carried out in eastern
Uganda (34° 0' E and 1° 40' N) to: a) evaluate the effect of tillage and cropping systems on soil
water storage, b) establish the water use efficiency in cassava-sorghum based cropping systems,
c) examine the fanners' perceptions and understanding of soil moisture availability and establish
whether knowledge/competences on soil moisture availability is used in planning cropping
cycles in the cassava-sorghum cropping systems. A field experiment was laid out in a
randomised complete block design (RCBD) consisting of two tillage practices (mouldboard
ploughing and ripping) and six cropping systems; i.e. i) sole cassava, ii) sole sorghum, iii) sole
cowpea, iv) cassava + sorghum, v) cassava +cowpea, vi) sorghum + cowpea comprised the
treatments and were replicated three times. Soil surface roughness was measured immediately
after ploughing and two months later. Soil moisture content was measured fortnightly at 0-10
and 20-40cm depths. Evapotranspiration (ET) was estimated using the soil water balance
approach. Yield of each crop was recorded at the end of each growing period. Water use
efficiency (WUE) (kg ha" mm") was calculated as a ratio of yield (kg ha-I ) to ET (mm). A
household-level survey was designed to collect responses on household, production and field
management characteristics and, knowledge on soil and water management in the cassavasorghum
cropping systems. Soil moisture content was higher under ripping than mouldboard
ploughing but, the upper (0- lOcm) layer had more moisture under mouldboard ploughing, while
ripping accumulated more moisture in the lower (20-40cm) layer of the root zone. Soil surface
roughness did not differ two months after mouldboard ploughing giving rise to a relatively
negligible surface runoff. Water use efficiency (WUE) varied significantly (a= 0.05) between
cropping systems with the highest observed in cassava (34.38kg ha-I mm") while the lowest was
3.76kg ha-I mm-I for sorghum. In both tillage practices WUE did not differ appreciably .. Also,
ET varied (a= 0.05) between cropping systems but was similar in both mouldboard and ripper
ploughed plots. Cassava + cowpea intercrop under mouldboard ploughing gave the best cassava
yield (20,023 kg ha"), however tillage practice did not significantly (a = 0.05) affect the yield in
sole cassava treatments. Cowpea yield was higher (8,397 kg ha') under mouldboard ploughing
than ripper ploughing (5,771 kg ha'). Sorghum yield was highest (1679 kg ha-1 ) under ripper
ploughing while the lowest was observed in sorghum + cowpea intercrop under mouldboard
ploughing. The change in soil moisture content was more negative in the mouldboard ploughed plots than in ripped plots specifically for sole cassava (-4.215 mm) cassava + cowpea (-4.736
mm). The household is a major source of labour for the cassava and sorghum farms with 53.8 %
of the households offering 4-6 persons to work on the farms. Up to 28% of the households did
not offer anyone for off-farm labour. Labour and knowledge at household level was used to
manage the land and most households derived their livelihood from exploiting land. Up to 65 and
59% of the farmers allocated a quarter of their land to sorghum and cassava respectively.
Farmers viewed soil and water management to have long term benefits, reduce soil erosion, and
likely to increase yields on the farm. Fanners' positively exploited their competence in using crop
rotation plans, selecting the right seed and evaluating the soil fertility status on field. However,
the competence in detecting water stress in crops and altering crop spacing to manage soil
moisture was not utilized when planning cassava-sorghum cropping cycles.
Language:
English
Date of publication:
2011
Country:
Region Focus:
East Africa
University/affiliation:
Collection:
RUFORUM Theses and Dissertations
Agris Subject Categories:
Additional keywords:
Licence conditions:
Open Access
Access restriction:
Form:
Printed resource
Publisher:
ISSN:
E_ISSN:
Edition:
Notes:
PhD thesis